V-8 and V-9 -- Cachalot and Cuttlefish
Even before V-5 and V-6 had been completed and V-7 laid down, submarine officer opinion had begun to shift in favor of smaller boats similar to Germany's 1200-ton U-135 design from World War I.
Then, when the London Naval Treaty of 1930 for the first time imposed international limits on total submarine tonnage, the incentive to build smaller ships became especially compelling. (The restrictions of the London Naval Treaty were a factor in the disposal in 1930 of T-1, T-2, and T-3, which had been laid up for nearly a decade. But by special agreement, Argonaut, Narwhal, and Nautilus were exempted from the treaty limitations.)
The result was the two smallest V-boats, USS Cachalot (originally V-8, SS-170) and USS Cuttlefish (originally V-9, SS-171), funded in fiscal year 1932. At 271 feet overall and only 1130 tons surface displacement, Cachalot and Cuttlefish were even smaller than the T-boats of 15 years earlier. The engineering plant consisted of two innovative, MAN-designed, compact main engines supposedly capable of delivering 1535 horsepower each, plus a single diesel generator rated at 440 horsepower. Although the boats approached 17 knots on trials, the new MAN engines failed repeatedly from excessive vibration and were replaced in 1938 by General Motors diesels with reduction gearing.
Perhaps of most interest was the Navy's assignment of Cuttlefish to the Electric Boat Company, the first submarine award to a private yard since the last of the S-boats in 1921. Accordingly, Cuttlefish differed from her Portsmouth-built sister, Cachalot, in many respects, including more spacious internal arrangements, the first installation of air conditioning on a U.S. submarine, and the first partial use of welding (vice riveting) in hull fabrication. Moreover, Cachalot and Cuttlefish served as the first test beds for the Mark I torpedo data computer that revolutionized underwater fire control in the mid-1930s.
Unfortunately, because small size severely limited their speed, endurance, and weapons load, neither boat was successful under the conditions of the Pacific war. Each did three scoreless war patrols in the central and western Pacific, and Cachalot did one in Alaskan waters, but by late 1942, it was clear both were out-classed and worn out, and they finished the war at New London as training ships. The two were decommissioned in October 1945 and broken up several years later.
Conclusion
By 21st century standards, the Navy's exploitation of the Congressional
"fleet-boat" authorization of 1916 to build five vastly different submarine designs in a series that ended only in 1934 may seem surprising or even disingenuous. However, as the only U.S. submarines built during an entire decade of shifting and often-contradictory operational concepts, the nine V-boats could hardly have been expected to be homogeneous. But the relative freedom that the Navy was granted to try so many novel submarine approaches in so few years may only have been matched subsequently in the initial era of the nuclear-propulsion program. Except for Narwhal and Nautilus -- and there for unexpected reasons -- none of the V-boats achieved significant success either in peacetime or under combat conditions in World War II. But the willingness to experiment -- or perhaps it was only shooting in the dark -- that produced the V-boats in all their interesting variety paid off handsomely in a host of lessons-learned that were quickly applied to the subsequent succession of true "fleet-boat" designs -- the
Porpoise,
Shark,
Salmon,
Sargo, and
Gato classes.
References
This article was based on "The Navy's Variegated V-Class: Out of One,
Many?" by Edward C. Whitman, published in the Fall 2003 issue of
Undersea Warfare: The Official Magazine of the U.S. Submarine Force
The magazine's masthead states:
- Authorization: UNDERSEA WARFARE is published quarterly from appropriated funds by authority of the Chief of Naval Operations in accordance with NPPR P-35. The Secretary of the Navy has determined that this publication is necessary in the transaction of business required by law of the Department of the Navy. Use of funds for printing this publication has been approved by the Navy Publications and Printing Policy Committee. Reproductions are encouraged. Controlled circulation.
Ships
In 1920, the Navy adopted a numbering scheme that distinguished between coastal and general purpose boats, designated "SS"; and fleet boats, designated "SF." Accordingly, T-1 through T-3 were originally designated SF-1 through SF-3, and V-1 through V-9 were designated SF-4 through SF-12. V-4 was also designated SM-1 at one time, indicative of her mine-laying role.
Source | Copyright